Croatia vs Lithuania: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1,610 kt against 1,540 kt in Croatia, a difference of 70 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 89th and Lithuania ranks 86th of 197 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,855 kt | 1,288 kt | 566.88 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 2,371 kt | 1,684 kt | 687 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2,156 kt | 2,345 kt | 189 kt | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 1,790 kt | 2,070 kt | 280 kt | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Croatia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 1,610 kt against 1,540 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Croatia and Lithuania?
- 70 kt, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Lithuania rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 89th and Lithuania ranks 86th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf