Honduras vs Slovenia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Honduras
- Slovenia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 743 kt against 722 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 21 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Honduras ranks 126th and Slovenia ranks 128th of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 364.75 kt | 703.25 kt | 338.5 kt | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 611.7 kt | 849.4 kt | 237.7 kt | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 767.2 kt | 637.8 kt | 129.4 kt | Honduras |
| 2020s | 714.75 kt | 716 kt | 1.25 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Honduras or Slovenia?
- Honduras, at 743 kt against 722 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Honduras and Slovenia?
- 21 kt, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Slovenia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Honduras ranks 126th and Slovenia ranks 128th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf