Kiribati vs Palau: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Kiribati
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 0.383 kt against 0.331 kt in Kiribati, a difference of 0.052 kt.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 190th and Palau ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2054 kt | 3.84 kt | 3.63 kt | Palau |
| 2000s | 0.31 kt | 2.72 kt | 2.41 kt | Palau |
| 2010s | 0.4704 kt | 1.31 kt | 0.8348 kt | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.3565 kt | 0.4943 kt | 0.1378 kt | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Kiribati or Palau?
- Palau, at 0.383 kt against 0.331 kt in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Kiribati and Palau?
- 0.052 kt, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Palau?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Palau rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Kiribati ranks 190th and Palau ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf