Mauritius vs South Sudan: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Mauritius
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 37.7 kt against 25.6 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 12.1 kt.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 150th and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.34 kt | 29.15 kt | 7.19 kt | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 34.55 kt | 24.75 kt | 9.8 kt | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Mauritius or South Sudan?
- Mauritius, at 37.7 kt against 25.6 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Mauritius and South Sudan?
- 12.1 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and South Sudan rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 150th and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf