Myanmar vs Slovakia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Myanmar
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 3,410 kt against 3,260 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 150 kt.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 74th and Slovakia ranks 73rd of 232 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 297.29 kt | 3,190 kt | 2,893 kt | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 326 kt | 3,413 kt | 3,087 kt | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 1,054 kt | 3,663 kt | 2,609 kt | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 2,948 kt | 3,635 kt | 687.5 kt | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Myanmar or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 3,410 kt against 3,260 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Myanmar and Slovakia?
- 150 kt, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Slovakia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 74th and Slovakia ranks 73rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf