Belgium vs Chile: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belgium
- Chile
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 13,613 kt against 12,264 kt in Chile, a difference of 1,349 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 55th of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,273 kt | 4,652 kt | 10,621 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 16,163 kt | 6,923 kt | 9,241 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 14,886 kt | 11,100 kt | 3,786 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Chile?
- Belgium, at 13,613 kt against 12,264 kt in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Chile?
- 1,349 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chile?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Chile rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 55th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf