Czechia vs Syria: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Czechia
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 7,463 kt against 7,380 kt in Czechia, a difference of 83 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 65th and Syria ranks 63rd of 232 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,887 kt | 3,311 kt | 2,576 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 6,612 kt | 4,753 kt | 1,859 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 7,577 kt | 4,953 kt | 2,624 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 7,849 kt | 6,851 kt | 998.31 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq), Czechia or Syria?
- Syria, at 7,463 kt against 7,380 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) between Czechia and Syria?
- 83 kt, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Syria?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Syria rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Czechia ranks 65th and Syria ranks 63rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf