Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
62,917 kt
in 2023
South Africa
32,274 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
24th
South Africa rank
26th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 62,917 kt against 32,274 kt in South Africa, a difference of 30,643 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 26th of 33 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,688 kt 16,730 kt 14,042 kt South Africa
1970s 3,893 kt 17,788 kt 13,895 kt South Africa
1980s 3,519 kt 12,912 kt 9,393 kt South Africa
1990s 15,902 kt 15,202 kt 699.9 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 25,642 kt 21,519 kt 4,123 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 43,378 kt 25,912 kt 17,466 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 61,608 kt 30,949 kt 30,659 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 62,917 kt against 32,274 kt in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
30,643 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 26th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf