Mozambique vs Serbia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Mozambique
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 2,746 kt against 2,736 kt in Mozambique, a difference of 10 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Mozambique ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 232 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,637 kt | 3,633 kt | 1,996 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2,045 kt | 2,695 kt | 650.25 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,629 kt | 2,646 kt | 17.19 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq), Mozambique or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 2,746 kt against 2,736 kt in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) between Mozambique and Serbia?
- 10 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Serbia rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Mozambique ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf