Serbia vs Sri Lanka: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Serbia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2,809 kt against 2,746 kt in Serbia, a difference of 63 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 105th and Sri Lanka ranks 104th of 232 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,633 kt | 895.34 kt | 2,738 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2,695 kt | 1,197 kt | 1,498 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,646 kt | 2,422 kt | 223.32 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq), Serbia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2,809 kt against 2,746 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 63 kt, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Serbia ranks 105th and Sri Lanka ranks 104th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf