Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)

Indonesia
132.72 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
80.76 kt
in 2023
Indonesia rank
25th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
26th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 132.72 kt against 80.76 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 51.96 kt.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.6 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 25th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6471 kt 20.59 kt 19.94 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 0.4614 kt 26.04 kt 25.58 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.1862 kt 10.13 kt 9.95 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 40.3 kt 37.01 kt 3.3 kt Indonesia
2000s 60.9 kt 68.82 kt 7.92 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 69.89 kt 82.72 kt 12.83 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 131.53 kt 88.37 kt 43.16 kt Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Indonesia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Indonesia, at 132.72 kt against 80.76 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
51.96 kt, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Indonesia ranks 25th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
181 places, 10,289 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf