Iraq vs Latvia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Iraq
- Latvia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 113th and Latvia ranks 113th of 148 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2637 kt | 0.6955 kt | 0.4317 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.2354 kt | 1.17 kt | 0.933 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0288 kt | 0.4249 kt | 0.3961 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Iraq or Latvia?
- Iraq, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Iraq and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Latvia rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Iraq ranks 113th and Latvia ranks 113th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf