Latvia vs Vietnam: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Latvia
- Vietnam
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Vietnam, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 113th and Vietnam ranks 113th of 148 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6955 kt | 0.0289 kt | 0.6665 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.17 kt | 0 kt | 1.17 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.4249 kt | 0 kt | 0.4249 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Latvia or Vietnam?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Vietnam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Latvia and Vietnam?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Vietnam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Vietnam rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Vietnam ranks 113th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf