Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
7.97 kt
in 2023
New Zealand
87.36 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
28th
New Zealand rank
25th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • New Zealand
050100150196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 87.36 kt against 7.97 kt in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 79.39 kt.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 11.0 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 42.11 kt 0 kt 42.11 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 49.59 kt 0 kt 49.59 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 21.11 kt 3.25 kt 17.86 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 17.44 kt 111.64 kt 94.19 kt New Zealand
2000s 13.56 kt 74.93 kt 61.37 kt New Zealand
2010s 8.94 kt 101.86 kt 92.92 kt New Zealand
2020s 7.7 kt 90.58 kt 82.88 kt New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 87.36 kt against 7.97 kt in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
79.39 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 9,847 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf