How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Zimbabwe: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre

Argentina

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Argentina rank

69th

Zimbabwe rank

70th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre over time

Argentina
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 70th of 119 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1970s	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre, Argentina or Zimbabwe?: Argentina, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre between Argentina and Zimbabwe?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre?: Argentina ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 70th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Zimbabwe: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zimbabwe/">Argentina vs Zimbabwe: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 120 places, 6,740 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.