How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Zambia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Chile

0.0007 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0005 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

67th

Zambia rank

68th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

Chile
Zambia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Chile ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 68th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0009 kt per square kilometre	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	Zambia
1970s	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Zambia
1980s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0009 kt per square kilometre	0.0009 kt per square kilometre	Zambia
1990s	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	0.0007 kt per square kilometre	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	Zambia
2000s	0.001 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Chile
2010s	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	0.0006 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Chile or Zambia?: Chile, at 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Chile and Zambia?: 0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 68th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zambia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/zambia/">Chile vs Zambia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.