Latvia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Latvia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
169th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
172nd

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 169th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 186 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Latvia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Latvia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Latvia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 169th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Latvia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.