Polynesia vs Rwanda: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Polynesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Polynesia ahead.
Polynesia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 74th of 234 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0435 kt | 0 kt | 0.0435 kt | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 0.0013 kt | 0 kt | 0.0013 kt | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 0.0125 kt | 0 kt | 0.0125 kt | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Polynesia or Rwanda?
- Polynesia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Rwanda rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Polynesia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 74th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf