Congo vs Nepal: Land-use change — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Nepal
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
14th
Nepal rank
15th
Land-use change — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Congo
- Nepal
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 14th and Nepal ranks 15th of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions (ch4), per capita, Congo or Nepal?
- Congo, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (ch4), per capita between Congo and Nepal?
- 0 kt per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for land-use change — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Congo ranks 14th and Nepal ranks 15th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land-use change — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land-use change — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.