Belgium-Luxembourg vs Costa Rica: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq)
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,242 kt against 1,007 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 235 kt.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 63rd and Costa Rica ranks 61st of 222 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 1,242 kt against 1,007 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica?
- 235 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica rank globally for land-use change — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 63rd and Costa Rica ranks 61st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf