Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
26,112 kt
in 2023
Myanmar
5,199 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
6th
Myanmar rank
6th

Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 26,112 kt against 5,199 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 20,913 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 5.0 times Myanmar's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 37,869 kt 6,358 kt 31,511 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 36,953 kt 5,800 kt 31,154 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 39,475 kt 5,913 kt 33,562 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 32,069 kt 5,858 kt 26,211 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 26,112 kt against 5,199 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
20,913 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 8,993 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf