Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
22,564 kt
in 2023
Myanmar
3,592 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Myanmar rank
5th

Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 22,564 kt against 3,592 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 18,972 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.3 times Myanmar's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Myanmar ranks 5th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 21,322 kt 2,974 kt 18,349 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 30,055 kt 4,013 kt 26,042 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 34,112 kt 4,190 kt 29,921 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 27,711 kt 4,169 kt 23,543 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 22,564 kt against 3,592 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
18,972 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for land-use change — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Myanmar ranks 5th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 8,993 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf