Ecuador vs United States: Land-use change — Emissions Share
Ecuador
0 %
in 2023
United States
0 %
in 2023
Ecuador rank
73rd
United States rank
73rd
Land-use change — Emissions Share over time
- Ecuador
- United States
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 % against 0 % in United States, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United States ahead.
Ecuador ranks 73rd and United States ranks 73rd of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % | 0.001 % | 0.001 % | United States |
| 2000s | 0.001 % | 0 % | 0.001 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.004 % | 0 % | 0.004 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions share, Ecuador or United States?
- Ecuador, at 0 % against 0 % in United States as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions share between Ecuador and United States?
- 0 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and United States rank globally for land-use change — emissions share?
- Ecuador ranks 73rd and United States ranks 73rd of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.