Ecuador vs Thailand: Land-use change — Emissions Share
Ecuador
20.42 %
in 2023
Thailand
15.97 %
in 2023
Ecuador rank
54th
Thailand rank
56th
Land-use change — Emissions Share over time
- Ecuador
- Thailand
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 20.42 % against 15.97 % in Thailand, a difference of 4.45 %.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 54th and Thailand ranks 56th of 209 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.63 % | 2.04 % | 62.59 % | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 51.18 % | 1.29 % | 49.89 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 38.74 % | 0.59 % | 38.15 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 27.69 % | 11.88 % | 15.81 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions share, Ecuador or Thailand?
- Ecuador, at 20.42 % against 15.97 % in Thailand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions share between Ecuador and Thailand?
- 4.45 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Thailand?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Thailand rank globally for land-use change — emissions share?
- Ecuador ranks 54th and Thailand ranks 56th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions Share (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.