Kiribati vs Tunisia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person (low-carbon)

Kiribati
74.34 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Tunisia
72.88 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Kiribati rank
159th
Tunisia rank
160th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person (low-carbon) over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tunisia
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 74.34 kilowatt-hours against 72.88 kilowatt-hours in Tunisia, a difference of 1.46 kilowatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 160th of 214 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kilowatt-hours 12.41 kilowatt-hours 12.41 kilowatt-hours Tunisia
2010s 8.07 kilowatt-hours 41.33 kilowatt-hours 33.26 kilowatt-hours Tunisia
2020s 76.72 kilowatt-hours 62.29 kilowatt-hours 14.43 kilowatt-hours Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person, Kiribati or Tunisia?
Kiribati, at 74.34 kilowatt-hours against 72.88 kilowatt-hours in Tunisia as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person between Kiribati and Tunisia?
1.46 kilowatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person?
Kiribati ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 160th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tunisia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-elec-per-capita/kiribati/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-elec-per-capita/kiribati/tunisia/">Kiribati vs Tunisia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 6,983 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.