Afghanistan vs Syria: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources

Afghanistan
0.86 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Syria
0.88 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
131st
Syria rank
130th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Syria
01234200020122024

How they compare

Syria currently reports 0.88 terawatt-hours against 0.86 terawatt-hours in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.02 terawatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Syria ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 131st and Syria ranks 130th of 214 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Syria Difference Ahead
2000s 0.586 terawatt-hours 3.28 terawatt-hours 2.7 terawatt-hours Syria
2010s 0.941 terawatt-hours 1.78 terawatt-hours 0.837 terawatt-hours Syria
2020s 0.904 terawatt-hours 0.856 terawatt-hours 0.048 terawatt-hours Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Afghanistan or Syria?
Syria, at 0.88 terawatt-hours against 0.86 terawatt-hours in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Afghanistan and Syria?
0.02 terawatt-hours, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Syria?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Syria rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
Afghanistan ranks 131st and Syria ranks 130th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Syria: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/afghanistan/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/afghanistan/syrian-arab-republic/">Afghanistan vs Syria: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 7,081 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.