Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Armenia
6.41 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
5.86 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Armenia rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
91st
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time
- Armenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 6.41 terawatt-hours against 5.86 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.55 terawatt-hours.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Armenia ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 209 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.87 terawatt-hours | 4.79 terawatt-hours | 0.914 terawatt-hours | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 4.52 terawatt-hours | 4.93 terawatt-hours | 0.405 terawatt-hours | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 5.05 terawatt-hours | 5.5 terawatt-hours | 0.446 terawatt-hours | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Armenia or Zimbabwe?
- Armenia, at 6.41 terawatt-hours against 5.86 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.55 terawatt-hours, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
- Armenia ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.