Brunei vs Nauru: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Brunei
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Nauru
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Brunei rank
181st
Nauru rank
181st
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time
- Brunei
- Nauru
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Nauru, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Brunei ranks 181st and Nauru ranks 181st of 209 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0.002 terawatt-hours | 0.002 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Brunei or Nauru?
- Brunei, at 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Brunei and Nauru?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Nauru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brunei and Nauru rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
- Brunei ranks 181st and Nauru ranks 181st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.