China vs CIS (EI): Electricity generation from low-carbon sources

China
4,408 terawatt-hours
in 2025
CIS (EI)
526.44 terawatt-hours
in 2025
China rank
1st
CIS (EI) rank
2nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time

  • China
  • CIS (EI)
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196519952025

How they compare

China currently reports 4,408 terawatt-hours against 526.44 terawatt-hours in CIS (EI), a difference of 3,882 terawatt-hours.

That makes China's figure about 8.4 times CIS (EI)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was CIS (EI) ahead.

China ranks 1st and CIS (EI) ranks 2nd of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and CIS (EI) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China CIS (EI) Difference Ahead
1990s 177.4 terawatt-hours 323.46 terawatt-hours 146.05 terawatt-hours CIS (EI)
2000s 458.53 terawatt-hours 368.76 terawatt-hours 89.78 terawatt-hours China
2010s 1,518 terawatt-hours 420.01 terawatt-hours 1,098 terawatt-hours China
2020s 3,347 terawatt-hours 507.03 terawatt-hours 2,840 terawatt-hours China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, China or CIS (EI)?
China, at 4,408 terawatt-hours against 526.44 terawatt-hours in CIS (EI) as of 2025.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between China and CIS (EI)?
3,882 terawatt-hours, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and CIS (EI)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do China and CIS (EI) rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
China ranks 1st and CIS (EI) ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs CIS (EI): Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/china/cis-ei/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/china/cis-ei/">China vs CIS (EI): Electricity generation from low-carbon sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 7,081 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.