Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources

Equatorial Guinea
0.4 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Palestine
0.39 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
147th
Palestine rank
148th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Palestine
00.10.20.30.40.5200020122024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.4 terawatt-hours against 0.39 terawatt-hours in Palestine, a difference of 0.01 terawatt-hours.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Palestine ranks 148th of 214 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 0.018 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.018 terawatt-hours Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.304 terawatt-hours 0.028 terawatt-hours 0.276 terawatt-hours Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.438 terawatt-hours 0.294 terawatt-hours 0.144 terawatt-hours Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Equatorial Guinea or Palestine?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.4 terawatt-hours against 0.39 terawatt-hours in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Equatorial Guinea and Palestine?
0.01 terawatt-hours, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palestine?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Palestine rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Palestine ranks 148th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/equatorial-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/equatorial-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/">Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 7,081 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.