Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources

Hong Kong, China
0.39 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Palestine, State of
0.39 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
148th
Palestine, State of rank
148th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Palestine, State of
00.10.20.30.4199020072024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.39 terawatt-hours against 0.39 terawatt-hours in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and Palestine, State of ranks 148th of 214 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours
2010s 0.087 terawatt-hours 0.028 terawatt-hours 0.059 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.306 terawatt-hours 0.294 terawatt-hours 0.012 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Hong Kong, China or Palestine, State of?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.39 terawatt-hours against 0.39 terawatt-hours in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
0 terawatt-hours, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and Palestine, State of ranks 148th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/hong-kong-sar-china/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/hong-kong-sar-china/west-bank-and-gaza/">Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 7,081 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.