Kiribati vs South Sudan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources

Kiribati
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
South Sudan
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
181st
South Sudan rank
181st

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources over time

  • Kiribati
  • South Sudan
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01200020122024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.

Kiribati ranks 181st and South Sudan ranks 181st of 209 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0013 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0013 terawatt-hours Kiribati
2020s 0.01 terawatt-hours 0.01 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, Kiribati or South Sudan?
Kiribati, at 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources between Kiribati and South Sudan?
0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Sudan?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and South Sudan rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources?
Kiribati ranks 181st and South Sudan ranks 181st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs South Sudan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/kiribati/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-electricity/kiribati/south-sudan/">Kiribati vs South Sudan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 7,081 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours. Low-carbon sources correspond to renewables and nuclear power, that produce significantly less greenhouse-gas emissions than fossil fuels. Renewables include solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, wave, and tidal.