French Polynesia vs Gibraltar: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
French Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
French Polynesia rank
118th
Gibraltar rank
118th
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- French Polynesia
- Gibraltar
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gibraltar, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Gibraltar ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 118th and Gibraltar ranks 118th of 192 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, French Polynesia or Gibraltar?
- French Polynesia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gibraltar as of 2000.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between French Polynesia and Gibraltar?
- 0 % change on previous year, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Gibraltar?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do French Polynesia and Gibraltar rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- French Polynesia ranks 118th and Gibraltar ranks 118th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.