Polynesia vs Solomon Islands: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Solomon Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Polynesia rank
118th
Solomon Islands rank
118th
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Polynesia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Polynesia ranks 118th and Solomon Islands ranks 118th of 192 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Polynesia or Solomon Islands?
- Polynesia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands as of 2012.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Polynesia and Solomon Islands rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Polynesia ranks 118th and Solomon Islands ranks 118th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.