Afghanistan vs Eritrea: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Afghanistan
- Eritrea
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eritrea, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Eritrea ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.003 kt | 0.1207 kt | 0.1178 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0017 kt | 0.096 kt | 0.0944 kt | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Afghanistan or Eritrea?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 0 kt, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Eritrea rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Eritrea ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf