Afghanistan vs Lesotho: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Afghanistan
- Lesotho
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Lesotho, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 106th and Lesotho ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0024 kt | 0.3735 kt | 0.3711 kt | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.0017 kt | 0.0033 kt | 0.0017 kt | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Afghanistan or Lesotho?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Afghanistan and Lesotho?
- 0 kt, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Lesotho?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Lesotho rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Afghanistan ranks 106th and Lesotho ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf