Argentina vs Malawi: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Argentina
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 3.98 kt against 3.93 kt in Argentina, a difference of 0.05 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 42nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.7 kt | 7.69 kt | 51.01 kt | Argentina |
| 2000s | 19.55 kt | 7.54 kt | 12.01 kt | Argentina |
| 2010s | 8.73 kt | 11.35 kt | 2.62 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 17.06 kt | 6.93 kt | 10.13 kt | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Argentina or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 3.98 kt against 3.93 kt in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Argentina and Malawi?
- 0.05 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Malawi rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Argentina ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 42nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf