Austria vs Kyrgyzstan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Austria ranks 132nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0087 kt | 0.0748 kt | 0.0662 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0109 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0103 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0127 kt | 0 kt | 0.0127 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.0063 kt | 0 kt | 0.0063 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Kyrgyzstan?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 132nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf