Austria vs Lesotho: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4)
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Austria
- Lesotho
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Lesotho, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Austria ranks 132nd and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0095 kt | 0.3735 kt | 0.364 kt | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.0109 kt | 0.0033 kt | 0.0076 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0127 kt | 0 kt | 0.0127 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.0063 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0056 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Lesotho?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Lesotho?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lesotho?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Lesotho rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 132nd and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf