Azerbaijan vs Mali: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Mali
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mali, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mali ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Mali ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0931 kt | 78.03 kt | 77.94 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.075 kt | 7.38 kt | 7.3 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.0289 kt | 0.021 kt | 0.0079 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0722 kt | 0.0126 kt | 0.0596 kt | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Azerbaijan or Mali?
- Azerbaijan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Azerbaijan and Mali?
- 0 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Mali rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Mali ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf