Belgium vs French Polynesia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 106th and French Polynesia ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 kt | 0 kt | 0.002 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.0013 kt | 0 kt | 0.0013 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Belgium or French Polynesia?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Belgium and French Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and French Polynesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and French Polynesia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 106th and French Polynesia ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf