Botswana vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.002 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Mongolia ranks 131st of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.65 kt | 9.23 kt | 5.58 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.1952 kt | 2.06 kt | 1.86 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0069 kt | 0.2412 kt | 0.2342 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0056 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0036 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Botswana or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Botswana and Mongolia?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Mongolia ranks 131st of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf