Botswana vs Slovenia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Slovenia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.29 kt | 0.0185 kt | 4.27 kt | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.1952 kt | 0.0164 kt | 0.1787 kt | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.0069 kt | 0.0247 kt | 0.0178 kt | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0056 kt | 0.0755 kt | 0.0699 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Botswana or Slovenia?
- Botswana, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Botswana and Slovenia?
- 0 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Slovenia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf