Burundi vs Croatia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Burundi
- Croatia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.0025 kt against 0.0025 kt in Croatia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Burundi ranks 123rd and Croatia ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3771 kt | 0.3544 kt | 0.0226 kt | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0.0723 kt | 0.0881 kt | 0.0158 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.0508 kt | 0.0843 kt | 0.0335 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.005 kt | 0.1085 kt | 0.1035 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Burundi or Croatia?
- Burundi, at 0.0025 kt against 0.0025 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Burundi and Croatia?
- 0 kt, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Croatia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Burundi ranks 123rd and Croatia ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf