Cayman Islands vs Libya: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Cayman Islands
- Libya
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 106th and Libya ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Cayman Islands or Libya?
- Cayman Islands, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Cayman Islands and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cayman Islands and Libya rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Cayman Islands ranks 106th and Libya ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf