Chad vs Nicaragua: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Chad
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Chad currently reports 11.58 kt against 7.61 kt in Nicaragua, a difference of 3.97 kt.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.5 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 28th and Nicaragua ranks 29th of 219 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.53 kt | 5.56 kt | 76.98 kt | Chad |
| 2000s | 35.53 kt | 1.9 kt | 33.64 kt | Chad |
| 2010s | 29.16 kt | 1.7 kt | 27.46 kt | Chad |
| 2020s | 16.05 kt | 3.11 kt | 12.94 kt | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Chad or Nicaragua?
- Chad, at 11.58 kt against 7.61 kt in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Chad and Nicaragua?
- 3.97 kt, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Nicaragua rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Chad ranks 28th and Nicaragua ranks 29th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf