Costa Rica vs Rwanda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Costa Rica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0582 kt against 0.057 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0012 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 99th of 254 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7205 kt | 0.2253 kt | 0.4952 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.3987 kt | 0.0337 kt | 0.3651 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.7206 kt | 0.0221 kt | 0.6986 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.7247 kt | 0.0161 kt | 0.7086 kt | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0582 kt against 0.057 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 0.0012 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 99th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf