Czechia vs Finland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Finland ahead.
Czechia ranks 106th and Finland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0099 kt | 0.0379 kt | 0.028 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.006 kt | 0.0116 kt | 0.0056 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.017 kt | 0.0045 kt | 0.0125 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0212 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0187 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Czechia and Finland?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 106th and Finland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf