Eritrea vs Lebanon: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Eritrea
- Lebanon
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Lebanon, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 106th and Lebanon ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1207 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.1187 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.096 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0958 kt | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0031 kt | 0.0031 kt | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Eritrea or Lebanon?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Eritrea and Lebanon?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lebanon?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Lebanon rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 106th and Lebanon ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf