Germany vs Slovakia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Germany
- Slovakia
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0081 kt | 0.0076 kt | 0.0005 kt | Germany |
| 2000s | 0.0224 kt | 0.0054 kt | 0.017 kt | Germany |
| 2010s | 0.0197 kt | 0.0045 kt | 0.0152 kt | Germany |
| 2020s | 0.0069 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0063 kt | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Germany or Slovakia?
- Germany, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Germany and Slovakia?
- 0 kt, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Slovakia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Germany ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf